BR100 Increased By (1.28%)
BR30 Increased By (1.58%)
KSE100 Increased By (0.94%)
KSE30 Increased By (0.99%)
BECO 5.77 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (3.22%)
BML 64.21 Increased By ▲ 3.18 (5.21%)
BOP 33.70 Increased By ▲ 0.45 (1.35%)
CNERGY 8.24 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (2.36%)
DCL 11.42 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (1.06%)
FCCL 53.32 Increased By ▲ 0.39 (0.74%)
FCSC 5.60 Increased By ▲ 0.26 (4.87%)
FFL 17.85 Increased By ▲ 0.24 (1.36%)
FNEL 1.32 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.76%)
HUMNL 11.20 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.72%)
KEL 7.99 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (1.27%)
KOSM 5.49 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (3%)
MLCF 86.25 Increased By ▲ 0.90 (1.05%)
NBP 184.99 Increased By ▲ 3.70 (2.04%)
PACE 12.27 Increased By ▲ 0.74 (6.42%)
PAEL 40.40 Increased By ▲ 0.99 (2.51%)
PIAHCLA 25.80 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (0.66%)
PIBTL 17.42 Increased By ▲ 0.27 (1.57%)
PPL 226.15 Increased By ▲ 1.33 (0.59%)
PRL 34.49 Increased By ▲ 0.31 (0.91%)
PTC 66.05 Increased By ▲ 0.97 (1.49%)
SEARL 90.67 Increased By ▲ 1.07 (1.19%)
SSGC 26.99 Increased By ▲ 0.68 (2.58%)
TELE 8.64 Increased By ▲ 0.26 (3.1%)
THCCL 70.97 Increased By ▲ 1.63 (2.35%)
TPLP 11.31 Increased By ▲ 1.03 (10.02%)
TREET 24.60 Increased By ▲ 0.40 (1.65%)
TRG 71.75 Increased By ▲ 2.21 (3.18%)
WAVES 11.46 Increased By ▲ 0.43 (3.9%)
WTL 1.28 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.79%)

Tracking the trend in overall economy, the general insurance business in Pakistan is also on a decline. Net premiums of the second biggest general insurance firm by revenue, EFU General Insurance, fell 13 percent year-on-year to Rs 1.38 billion in the second quarter ending June.
The slowdown in economy seems to have strained EFU more, relative to its peer Adamjee Insurance, resulting in a 10 percent decline in net premium revenue during the period - indicating negative growth in business activities of the countrys private sector. However, for EFU, an improved claim ratio (from 71% in 1HCY08 to 65% in 1HCY09) partially offset the impact of lower revenues.
This biggest blow to EFUs bottom-line profits, however, came from sliding investment income which decreased by 69 percent during the first six months - eroding the impact of improved claim ratio. The conditions were even worse in the second quarter where the decline in claim ratio was relatively lower, leading to a dismal bottom-line performance.
Nonetheless, the management did a good job by curtailing administrative expenditure, down 7 percent year-on-year in Apr-Jun period, in an effort to arrest the fall in profits. The companys stock - which has underperformed the index since January 2009 - took a battering after the recently announced results, falling 5 percent to Rs 93.60 by Tuesdays close.
With the companys investment income - about 50 to 70 percent contributor in operating income - likely to normalise in the medium term, the companys earnings are likely to stabilise going forward. And while the claims are seen oscillating like a pendulum, the major worry for EFUs management, rather the whole insurance industry, is to take net premiums back on the same track as of nominal GDP growth.



================================================================================
EFU GENERAL INSURANCE
================================================================================
RS (INN) 2Q CY 09 2Q CY 08 % CHG 1H CY 09 1H CY 08 % CHG
================================================================================
Net premium revenue 1,375 1,569 -12 % 2,799 3,091 -10 %
Net claims 946 1,120 -15 % 1,822 2,183 -17 %
Net commission 120 139 -13 % 215 222 -3 %
Underwriting results 30 57 -48 % 209 215 -3 %
Investment income 32 (32) N/A 79 254 -69 %
General & Admin expense 119 128 -7 % 225 223 1 %
Profit before tax (14) (20) -28 % 203 365 -44 %
Profit after tax (20) 70 N/A 140 325 -57 %
EFS (Rs) (0.18) 0.61 N/A 1.22 2.83 -57 %
================================================================================

Source: Company results

Copyright Business Recorder, 2009

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.