BR100 Increased By (1%)
BR30 Increased By (1.18%)
KSE100 Increased By (0.89%)
KSE30 Increased By (0.86%)
BECO 5.73 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (2.5%)
BML 63.50 Increased By ▲ 2.47 (4.05%)
BOP 33.61 Increased By ▲ 0.36 (1.08%)
CNERGY 8.24 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (2.36%)
DCL 11.44 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (1.24%)
FCCL 52.95 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.04%)
FCSC 5.55 Increased By ▲ 0.21 (3.93%)
FFL 17.81 Increased By ▲ 0.20 (1.14%)
FNEL 1.31 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
HUMNL 11.17 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.45%)
KEL 7.97 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (1.01%)
KOSM 5.48 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (2.81%)
MLCF 86.02 Increased By ▲ 0.67 (0.79%)
NBP 184.51 Increased By ▲ 3.22 (1.78%)
PACE 12.00 Increased By ▲ 0.47 (4.08%)
PAEL 40.29 Increased By ▲ 0.88 (2.23%)
PIAHCLA 25.71 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.31%)
PIBTL 17.30 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (0.87%)
PPL 225.80 Increased By ▲ 0.98 (0.44%)
PRL 34.29 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (0.32%)
PTC 65.75 Increased By ▲ 0.67 (1.03%)
SEARL 90.61 Increased By ▲ 1.01 (1.13%)
SSGC 26.84 Increased By ▲ 0.53 (2.01%)
TELE 8.59 Increased By ▲ 0.21 (2.51%)
THCCL 69.81 Increased By ▲ 0.47 (0.68%)
TPLP 11.31 Increased By ▲ 1.03 (10.02%)
TREET 24.53 Increased By ▲ 0.33 (1.36%)
TRG 71.85 Increased By ▲ 2.31 (3.32%)
WAVES 11.52 Increased By ▲ 0.49 (4.44%)
WTL 1.29 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (1.57%)

imageISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court on Thursday dismissed a petition filed by Muhammad Hussain Mehnati, Ameer Jamaat-i-Islami (JI), Karachi regarding the rigging in the mega city during the general elections.

The three-member bench comprising Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, Justice Ijaz Ahmed Chaudhry and Justice Gulzar Ahmed heard the constitutional petition filed by Mehnati under Article 184 (3) of the Constitution.

The Chief Justice remarked that how a political party, which did not take part in the election, could raise finger on its results.

The counsel for Mehnati stated that the JI boycotted the polling in the port city on the very same day due to lot of complaints regarding the alleged rigging.

The CJ asked that how could a political party, which had boycotted the polling process, ask for its reversal.

"You are the person, who boycotted the election and now you are seeking a remedy," he added.

The bench noted that Article 184 (3) could not be evoked when a party had boycotted the elections and dismissed the petition.

It may be worth mentioning that Article 184 of the Constitution is about the original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court, while the Article 184 (3) states the Supreme Court can make an order in a matter where there is a matter of the enforcement of fundamental right.

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.