BR100 Increased By (1.31%)
BR30 Increased By (1.53%)
KSE100 Increased By (1.02%)
KSE30 Increased By (1.05%)
BECO 5.75 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (2.86%)
BML 63.00 Increased By ▲ 1.97 (3.23%)
BOP 33.70 Increased By ▲ 0.45 (1.35%)
CNERGY 8.27 Increased By ▲ 0.22 (2.73%)
DCL 11.51 Increased By ▲ 0.21 (1.86%)
FCCL 53.29 Increased By ▲ 0.36 (0.68%)
FCSC 5.65 Increased By ▲ 0.31 (5.81%)
FFL 17.87 Increased By ▲ 0.26 (1.48%)
FNEL 1.32 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.76%)
HUMNL 11.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.18%)
KEL 7.99 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (1.27%)
KOSM 5.50 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (3.19%)
MLCF 86.25 Increased By ▲ 0.90 (1.05%)
NBP 185.27 Increased By ▲ 3.98 (2.2%)
PACE 12.30 Increased By ▲ 0.77 (6.68%)
PAEL 40.70 Increased By ▲ 1.29 (3.27%)
PIAHCLA 25.85 Increased By ▲ 0.22 (0.86%)
PIBTL 17.46 Increased By ▲ 0.31 (1.81%)
PPL 226.00 Increased By ▲ 1.18 (0.52%)
PRL 34.52 Increased By ▲ 0.34 (0.99%)
PTC 65.92 Increased By ▲ 0.84 (1.29%)
SEARL 91.15 Increased By ▲ 1.55 (1.73%)
SSGC 26.80 Increased By ▲ 0.49 (1.86%)
TELE 8.59 Increased By ▲ 0.21 (2.51%)
THCCL 70.90 Increased By ▲ 1.56 (2.25%)
TPLP 11.31 Increased By ▲ 1.03 (10.02%)
TREET 24.58 Increased By ▲ 0.38 (1.57%)
TRG 71.90 Increased By ▲ 2.36 (3.39%)
WAVES 11.64 Increased By ▲ 0.61 (5.53%)
WTL 1.27 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court Monday rejected a review petition filed by former lower court employee Ahtisham-ul-Haq seeking restoration of job. Ahtisham-ul-Haq was working in Civil Court Kharian as Record Keeper and Services Tribunal terminated his employment over leakage of state documents.

The Supreme Court also maintained the Services Tribunal ordered. Later, the petitioner filed a review petition in the Supreme Court against its orders.

A three-member bench of the  court headed by Chief Justice Asif Saeed Khan Khosa and comprising Justice Sheikh Azmat Saeed and Justice Umar Ata Bandial dismissed the review appeal and remarked that it was not a matter of basic rights so the court had already rejected an appeal in this regard.

During the course of proceedings, the Chief Justice observed that the petitioner had also changed his counsel.

According to the law, the lawyer who will appear in the first case, the same lawyer will also appear in the review appeal so that no other lawyer could raise false hope for the petitioners in the review petitions, he added.

The counsel for the petitioner said that his client could not submit documents before the Sessions Judge due to strike.

The Chief Justice remarked that lawyers would be on strike not judges. The law makes its own way whenever such matters surfaces, he added. The court after hearing arguments dismissed the review petition and remarked that it was not a matter of basic rights.

Copyright APP (Associated Press of Pakistan), 2019

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.