Hardly a day goes by when the government is not lambasted for its lackadaisical approach towards pressing economic and social issues confronting the nation. So it is ironic that sometimes, the best course of action for the government is to stand back and do nothing. The recent conflagration between PCGA and APTMA over relatively stoic cotton prices came to a head in recent days and finally warranted the Presidents attention in the form of a video conference with PCGA. Media reports quoting sources from this meeting have now asserted that the President turned down PCGAs request for government support to growers and ginners in the form of a support price or intervention by TCP. Setting aside any contrarian arguments about the clout enjoyed by textile mill owners or cotton growers; the decision to let market forces decide the trend of cotton prices, is laudable. For once, the arguments put forth by representatives of the value-added textile manufacturers are sound. FBS data reveals that exports of raw cotton in quantity terms have mushroomed by 154.3 percent from FY08 to FY11. However, over the same period, quantities exported for readymade garments and bed wear fell by 14.5 percent and 7.8 percent, respectively. The contraction in export quantities has become even more acute in the recent past. Quantities of exports from all value-added textile sectors have plummeted in the current fiscal when compared to the same period, in FY11. The increases in exports under the same heads visible in the trade account are attributable to rising prices of textile products and only serve to cloud the dismal lack of improvement in quantities exported by the textile sector. The utter lack of trade development on the part of the countrys textile sector is largely to blame for this stagnation. But given the plethora of shortcomings including the power crisis, political uncertainty and dismal law and order situation, pinning the blame is fodder for another debate. However, the fact is that any significant increases in the prices of textile products would pose severe threats to the countrys trade account. Given the fact that India and China have built significant reserves of cotton, staying competitive in international markets will be no mean feat of local manufacturers. At a time when other sources of precious foreign exchange are fast running out of steam, the government has done well, just by refraining from poking its stick in the demand-supply tussle. Whether the growers plight demands policy action or not; the government has no business affecting market forces, especially in the cotton conundrum.
=================================================================
Textile group exports
=================================================================
(July-Oct)
Unit FY11 FY12 chg
=================================================================
RAW COTTON M.T 31,406 35,988 15%
COTTON YARN M.T 170,887 150,864 -12%
COTTON CLOTH TH.SQM 684,465 627,468 -8%
COTTON CARDED OR COMBED M.T 10,107 119 -99%
YARN OTHER THAN COTTON YARN M.T 3,560 4,628 30%
KNITWEAR TH.DOZ 43,023 39,500 -8%
BED WEAR M.T 109,820 88,122 -20%
TOWELS M.T 59,368 55,107 -7%
TENTS,CANVAS & TARPULIN M.T 2,432 6,819 180%
READYMADE GARMENTS TH.DOZ 10,727 10,096 -6%
ART,SILK & SYNTHETIC TEXTILE TH.SQM 157,621 136,288 -14%
=================================================================
Source: FBS






















Comments
Comments are closed for this article.