BR100 Increased By (1.08%)
BR30 Increased By (1.25%)
KSE100 Increased By (0.81%)
KSE30 Increased By (0.8%)
BECO 5.72 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (2.33%)
BML 63.50 Increased By ▲ 2.47 (4.05%)
BOP 33.60 Increased By ▲ 0.35 (1.05%)
CNERGY 8.25 Increased By ▲ 0.20 (2.48%)
DCL 11.46 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (1.42%)
FCCL 52.85 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.15%)
FCSC 5.58 Increased By ▲ 0.24 (4.49%)
FFL 17.85 Increased By ▲ 0.24 (1.36%)
FNEL 1.31 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
HUMNL 11.17 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.45%)
KEL 7.96 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.89%)
KOSM 5.48 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (2.81%)
MLCF 85.98 Increased By ▲ 0.63 (0.74%)
NBP 184.62 Increased By ▲ 3.33 (1.84%)
PACE 12.15 Increased By ▲ 0.62 (5.38%)
PAEL 40.30 Increased By ▲ 0.89 (2.26%)
PIAHCLA 25.75 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (0.47%)
PIBTL 17.33 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (1.05%)
PPL 226.25 Increased By ▲ 1.43 (0.64%)
PRL 34.35 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (0.5%)
PTC 65.66 Increased By ▲ 0.58 (0.89%)
SEARL 90.62 Increased By ▲ 1.02 (1.14%)
SSGC 26.82 Increased By ▲ 0.51 (1.94%)
TELE 8.65 Increased By ▲ 0.27 (3.22%)
THCCL 69.80 Increased By ▲ 0.46 (0.66%)
TPLP 11.31 Increased By ▲ 1.03 (10.02%)
TREET 24.52 Increased By ▲ 0.32 (1.32%)
TRG 71.90 Increased By ▲ 2.36 (3.39%)
WAVES 11.63 Increased By ▲ 0.60 (5.44%)
WTL 1.29 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (1.57%)
BR Research

Why bail the refineries?

Published July 15, 2010 Updated July 15, 2010 12:00am

Not a month passes by and local newspapers are graced with pleas of different industries - urging the government to save them before they run aground into losses. Be it the spinning industry, the textile-value added sector or the automobile players - all have one thing in common i.e. their strategic importance to the country.
The latest addition on the list is the refinery sector, which is now seeking governments help in order to be saved from closing down completely.
What refineries are demanding is a fair and consistent pricing solution for their survival. But whats the problem? Well, some of them have not been making profits of late, owing to a host of reasons.
First and foremost, the refineries in Pakistan are just not good enough to compete at the international level which hurts their margins. Secondly, the devil of circular debt has hit them really bad.
"Refineries operation in Pakistan is not sustainable. The refining units are simple and 40 percent of the refined products yield negative margins - local refineries cannot compete because they are inefficient and small and need governments tariff support to sustain themselves", Chairman Pakistan Refinery Farooq Rahmatullah told BR Research.
Rahmatullahs views, however, are not seconded by all the industry experts as a sitting director of a leading refinery told BR Research, on the condition of anonymity that the plea of raising the tariff structure is based on false intentions and should not be granted.
"These refineries are already being subsidized in the form of 7.5 percent deemed duty...these are very inefficient hydro-skimming refineries which are considered crap anywhere else in the world...90 percent of the kind make losses in the world.. What strategic asset is it when you will get peanuts if you go out to sell them? It is much better to shut down the refineries and start importing" - believe it or not, this came from a director at a refinery.
It should be recalled that the refineries have collected billions of rupees in the form of deemed duty, aimed at improving the refined product quality. But, despite huge collection in this account and a time of eight years and counting - nothing of note has been done in regards to reducing the sulphur content from the refined products.
The refineries merrily kept on building the reserves in good times of profit making without ever complaining of an unfair pricing mechanism. It is only now, when some refineries have reported losses that the pricing mechanism stands unjustified and a threat to the industrys survival.
Surprisingly, the refineries want to be subsidized by the government despite knowing Islamabads fiscal constraints. If ever, their demands are granted, the burden is more likely to fall on the end consumers who are already paying deemed duty in the hope of a cleaner fuel - the chances of which happening are distant.
One may ask, why should the people pay for inefficient systems of the commercially run organizations. Interestingly, it is the very consumer who is also paying for the inefficiency for the power sector in the form of increased tariffs - refiners circular debt problems are a result of power sector inefficiency - surely, they shouldn be made to pay twice.

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.