BR100 Increased By (0.99%)
BR30 Increased By (1.17%)
KSE100 Increased By (0.81%)
KSE30 Increased By (0.77%)
BECO 5.67 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (1.43%)
BML 65.00 Increased By ▲ 3.97 (6.5%)
BOP 33.62 Increased By ▲ 0.37 (1.11%)
CNERGY 8.21 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (1.99%)
DCL 11.35 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.44%)
FCCL 52.95 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.04%)
FCSC 5.53 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (3.56%)
FFL 17.79 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (1.02%)
FNEL 1.31 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
HUMNL 11.19 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.63%)
KEL 7.99 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (1.27%)
KOSM 5.44 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (2.06%)
MLCF 86.00 Increased By ▲ 0.65 (0.76%)
NBP 185.98 Increased By ▲ 4.69 (2.59%)
PACE 12.05 Increased By ▲ 0.52 (4.51%)
PAEL 40.30 Increased By ▲ 0.89 (2.26%)
PIAHCLA 25.74 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (0.43%)
PIBTL 17.39 Increased By ▲ 0.24 (1.4%)
PPL 225.00 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (0.08%)
PRL 34.55 Increased By ▲ 0.37 (1.08%)
PTC 65.25 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (0.26%)
SEARL 90.52 Increased By ▲ 0.92 (1.03%)
SSGC 26.83 Increased By ▲ 0.52 (1.98%)
TELE 9.12 Increased By ▲ 0.74 (8.83%)
THCCL 69.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-0.2%)
TPLP 11.31 Increased By ▲ 1.03 (10.02%)
TREET 24.64 Increased By ▲ 0.44 (1.82%)
TRG 71.48 Increased By ▲ 1.94 (2.79%)
WAVES 11.32 Increased By ▲ 0.29 (2.63%)
WTL 1.29 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (1.57%)

Tracking the trend in overall economy, the general insurance business in Pakistan is also on a decline. Net premiums of the second biggest general insurance firm by revenue, EFU General Insurance, fell 13 percent year-on-year to Rs 1.38 billion in the second quarter ending June.
The slowdown in economy seems to have strained EFU more, relative to its peer Adamjee Insurance, resulting in a 10 percent decline in net premium revenue during the period - indicating negative growth in business activities of the countrys private sector. However, for EFU, an improved claim ratio (from 71% in 1HCY08 to 65% in 1HCY09) partially offset the impact of lower revenues.
This biggest blow to EFUs bottom-line profits, however, came from sliding investment income which decreased by 69 percent during the first six months - eroding the impact of improved claim ratio. The conditions were even worse in the second quarter where the decline in claim ratio was relatively lower, leading to a dismal bottom-line performance.
Nonetheless, the management did a good job by curtailing administrative expenditure, down 7 percent year-on-year in Apr-Jun period, in an effort to arrest the fall in profits. The companys stock - which has underperformed the index since January 2009 - took a battering after the recently announced results, falling 5 percent to Rs 93.60 by Tuesdays close.
With the companys investment income - about 50 to 70 percent contributor in operating income - likely to normalise in the medium term, the companys earnings are likely to stabilise going forward. And while the claims are seen oscillating like a pendulum, the major worry for EFUs management, rather the whole insurance industry, is to take net premiums back on the same track as of nominal GDP growth.



================================================================================
EFU GENERAL INSURANCE
================================================================================
RS (INN) 2Q CY 09 2Q CY 08 % CHG 1H CY 09 1H CY 08 % CHG
================================================================================
Net premium revenue 1,375 1,569 -12 % 2,799 3,091 -10 %
Net claims 946 1,120 -15 % 1,822 2,183 -17 %
Net commission 120 139 -13 % 215 222 -3 %
Underwriting results 30 57 -48 % 209 215 -3 %
Investment income 32 (32) N/A 79 254 -69 %
General & Admin expense 119 128 -7 % 225 223 1 %
Profit before tax (14) (20) -28 % 203 365 -44 %
Profit after tax (20) 70 N/A 140 325 -57 %
EFS (Rs) (0.18) 0.61 N/A 1.22 2.83 -57 %
================================================================================

Source: Company results

Copyright Business Recorder, 2009

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.